Two reports of the same shape: a network was left and came back after a
restart, and `network join` asked for a secret it could have invented.
The first was not a bug in leaving. The secret on the start command line
derives the network id, so a command line carrying the secret of a network
you have just left recreates it on the next start — which is right, it says
to join that network, but nothing on screen said so. `up` now marks the
network `· new` or `· already here`, and warns in full when another
configured network answers to the same name. A name is a label; the id is
the identity, and the secret is what decides which of them this is. Said at
the moment it happens it is obvious; discovered later in a status report it
is a mystery, which is exactly how it went.
The second was an omission: `up` had learned to invent a secret and
`network join` had not, so the quickest possible thing — a network with
somebody for as long as it is needed, then gone — still needed a secret
generated first. Both now resolve a bare name the same way: the one network
of that name this device already has, or a fresh random secret when there
is none. It is printed in full, with the single line the other person can
paste as it stands, endpoint id included, because a secret nobody can read
is a network nobody can join.
The id is printed in full by both answers now. The shortened form belongs in
a report, where it is read; this one gets copied into the next command.
Covered end to end against a running agent: joining with no secret prints a
secret and a pasteable command with a peer in it, and joining a name this
device already has resumes that network instead of making another that
merely looks the same.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
tsunagiandClaude Opus 5
415b6a6667